[lkml]   [1996]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.1.6 vs. 2.0.23

On 29 Oct 1996, Alexander Sanda wrote:

> Well, 2.1.6 compiles without problems (including sound support), so I
> did some benchmarking against 2.0.23.
> NOTE: I'am running 2.0.23 with Robert L. Krawitz's fast-pentium-memcpy
> patch, so the results for 2.0.23 may be a little bit better than
> expected.
Is this patch going to be incorporated into the kernel? Or where can I
get it? Is it good on a pentium as well as PPro?


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.050 / U:2.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site