lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [linux-security] Re: kernel bug -> security problem
    On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Jon Lewis wrote:

    > On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Paul Christenson wrote:
    >
    > > We found that it does not crash a 1.2.13 Slackware machine, but does on
    > > Debian running 2.0.6 and 2.0.23.
    > >
    > > Can someone repost the patch, or at least tell when 2.0.24 is due for
    > > release?
    >
    > http://www.uk.linux.org/NetNews.html
    >
    I downloaded the big-ping-patch but I can't install it with Linux 2.0.23 !!!
    This is my report:
    patch -p0 <big-ping-patch

    Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
    The text leading up to this was:
    --------------------------
    |diff --unified --recursive --new-file --exclude-from exclude linux.vanilla/include/linux/skbuff.h linux/include/linux/skbuff.h
    |--- linux.vanilla/include/linux/skbuff.h Tue Oct 8 17:43:35 1996
    |+++ linux/include/linux/skbuff.h Tue Oct 22 12:46:04 1996
    --------------------------
    Patching file linux/include/linux/skbuff.h using Plan A...
    Hunk #1 failed at 102.
    1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to linux/include/linux/skbuff.h.rej
    Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
    The text leading up to this was:
    --------------------------
    |diff --unified --recursive --new-file --exclude-from exclude linux.vanilla/include/net/sock.h linux/include/net/sock.h
    |--- linux.vanilla/include/net/sock.h Tue Oct 8 17:45:32 1996
    |+++ linux/include/net/sock.h Tue Oct 22 12:48:06 1996
    --------------------------
    Patching file linux/include/net/sock.h using Plan A...
    Hunk #1 failed at 216.
    Hunk #2 failed at 251.
    2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to linux/include/net/sock.h.rej
    Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
    The text leading up to this was:
    --------------------------
    |diff --unified --recursive --new-file --exclude-from exclude linux.vanilla/net/ipv4/icmp.c linux/net/ipv4/icmp.c
    |--- linux.vanilla/net/ipv4/icmp.c Sun Oct 6 15:42:09 1996
    |+++ linux/net/ipv4/icmp.c Tue Oct 22 12:45:41 1996
    --------------------------
    Patching file linux/net/ipv4/icmp.c using Plan A...
    Hunk #1 failed at 1031.
    1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to linux/net/ipv4/icmp.c.rej
    Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
    The text leading up to this was:
    --------------------------
    |diff --unified --recursive --new-file --exclude-from exclude linux.vanilla/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c linux/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
    |--- linux.vanilla/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c Sat Aug 10 08:03:16 1996
    |+++ linux/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c Tue Oct 22 12:27:07 1996
    --------------------------
    Patching file linux/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c using Plan A...
    Hunk #1 failed at 24.
    Hunk #2 failed at 338.
    Hunk #3 failed at 375.
    Hunk #4 failed at 433.
    Hunk #5 failed at 470.
    5 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to linux/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c.rej
    done

    Which Kernel version should I install for patching it ??

    Max Liccardo mliccardo@tim.it (at work)
    mc7155@mclink.it (at home)

    "..fatti non foste per viver come bruti,
    ma per seguir virtute e cAnoscenza .."


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.020 / U:63.836 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site