[lkml]   [1996]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: noatime support in kernel?
In article <54r3k4$>,
H. Peter Anvin <> wrote:

>Doing this in general breaks UNIX security as we know it, so it
>*definitely* would have to be a filesystem mount option.

The atime patch is implemented as a mount option (no_atime)

The inode patch seems to be also, but its major intended use is to read
files which are globally readable anyway. In most situations, the news
partition (whether a disk or an md array) is on its lonesome anyway, as
that's the only way to get enough speed out of them.

FWIW, my news machine is averaging 5 article writes per second and about 5
times that figure for reads. The atime patch led to a 400% speedup in UUCP
newsbatching on my system, so the 30% being bandied around can be improved
on in some specialised circumstances (presorted batchlist, enough ram to
buffer/cache things, etc)

If you go down to the woods today you're sure for a big surpise: Teddies
in leather who bang heads together, with black liner round their eyes.

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.176 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site