[lkml]   [1996]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Memory upgrade: not faster / nfs
Keith Rohrer wrote:
> The original poster was complaining about having thrown an additional
> 32 megs into a dickless workstation and not seeing much performance
Cause usually, a workstation is a male ? :*) Sorry, couldn't resist...

> improvement. Either using -pipe or using a small ramdisk for /tmp
> would reduce the NFS problem for compilation to just the source, .o's,
> and executable; tempfs would've reclaimed all unused parts of the ramdisk
> as a hunk of swap space (and vice versa). I'm not quite certain what
> the aversion to a local hard drive in the machine was, but I'm sure
> there's a reason, maybe even a good one.
> Keith
> Disclaimer: Do not taunt Happy Fun God.

Philippe Strauss, CH-1092 Belmont

Email: <>

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.098 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site