Messages in this thread |  | | From | (Philippe Strauss) | Subject | Re: Memory upgrade: not faster / nfs | Date | Sun, 27 Oct 1996 11:27:03 +0100 (MET) |
| |
Keith Rohrer wrote: > > The original poster was complaining about having thrown an additional > 32 megs into a dickless workstation and not seeing much performance ^^^^^^^^ Cause usually, a workstation is a male ? :*) Sorry, couldn't resist...
> improvement. Either using -pipe or using a small ramdisk for /tmp > would reduce the NFS problem for compilation to just the source, .o's, > and executable; tempfs would've reclaimed all unused parts of the ramdisk > as a hunk of swap space (and vice versa). I'm not quite certain what > the aversion to a local hard drive in the machine was, but I'm sure > there's a reason, maybe even a good one. > > Keith > > Disclaimer: Do not taunt Happy Fun God. >
-- Philippe Strauss, CH-1092 Belmont
Email: <philippe.strauss@urbanet.ch> Homepage: http://sicel-home-1-4.urbanet.ch
|  |