Messages in this thread |  | | From | Johnny Stenback <> | Subject | Re: Byte article - 64 bit Unix | Date | Sat, 26 Oct 1996 13:09:18 +0300 (EET DST) |
| |
> Linux probably wasn't mentioned because Linux isn't 64-bit <jeez i hope > i'm right so i don't get flamed ;> > > -Rob
Intel and sparc Linux isn't 64-bit but yes, the Alpha version is 64-bit...
> > On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Tyson D Sawyer wrote: > > > I quote from page 141 of the November 1996 issue of Byte in the box > > titled "Unix Pushes the 64-bit Encelope": > > > > Digital Equipment's Unix, IBM's OS/400, and > > Silcon Graphic's Irix are the only full > > 64-bit OS environments available today. > > > > This seems at least a little inflamatory to a Linux (sadly, not Alpha) > > user such as myself. No meaning of that statement is lost due to missing > > context and Linux is not mentioned in the article anywhere. > > > > Ty > > > > >
-- Johnny Stenback, programmer / University of Vaasa, Computer Centre E-Mail jst@uwasa.fi, Phone +358 50 5575 094
|  |