Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 23 Oct 1996 09:58:33 -0600 (CST) | From | Colten Edwards <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.5 (Exception at xxxxxx) |
| |
On Wed, 23 Oct 1996, Christian Jonsson wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Jared Mauch wrote: > > > Seeing a few of these in my logs: > > > > Exception at c012d84f (c012d85e) > > Exception at c012d84f (c012d85e) > > Exception at c012d84f (c012d85e) > > Exception at c012d84f (c012d85e) > > > > > > Should I be concerned and send bug reports about these in, with > > my System.map references to the function calls that are printing these? > > > > (I'n not just getting these same few addresses either, I get them > > around in various other functions too). > > > > - jared > > > > > > > > I too get such exceptions. In my case the situation is > > Oct 22 15:02:45 pc7212 kernel: Exception at c012d63b (c012d64a) > Oct 22 15:03:41 pc7212 kernel: Exception at c012d63b (c012d64a) > Oct 22 15:10:06 pc7212 kernel: Exception at c012d63b (c012d64a) > Oct 22 15:12:45 pc7212 kernel: Exception at c012d63b (c012d64a) > Oct 22 15:12:55 pc7212 kernel: Exception at c012d63b (c012d64a) > > I don't know what this means, but I do know that I get page faults, i.e., > page_fault is called. The relevant System.map tells me of nothing at c012d63b, > if that's relevant. Anyone got an idea of what's going on and how to track it > down? BTW, I do have libc-5.4.7 and I'm on a laptop with Pico Power Tech. > system chip, if that's relevant. > How much memory to you guys have in your machines. I never had a problem until I upgraded my system to 32meg. Unfortunately I ended up with some 70ns ram for the upgrade and no return possible. When I added a wait state these exceptions seem to have disappeared.
Colten Edwards
|  |