Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 1 Oct 1996 13:01:21 -0400 (EDT) | From | G Sumner Hayes <> | Subject | Re: kernel version info from finger |
| |
Agus Budy Wuysang <fswmis@rad.net.id> writes: > How about adding latest version for each 1.2.x, 1.3.x, and 2.0.x for > the "finger @linux.cs.helsinki.fi"? (not just 2.1.x) > What about 1.0.x, 1.1.x, and 0.99.x?
Actually, listing the latest stable kernel as well as the latest development kernel is a good idea. When 2.0 came out, there was no newer devel. kernel; now there is, so listing:
Linux 2.1.0 (DEVELOPMENT) Linux 2.0.21 (STABLE)
would be a good idea. Otherwise people could be confused by the switching back and forth (2.1.0 is released, then 2.0.22, then 2.1.1, ...) I see no reason to list obsolete kernels from the 1.3.x or 1.2.x lines, though.
'Course, I just check funet to see what's there.
TTFN,
Sumner
|  |