![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread Complete thread (EXPERIMENTAL) |
* Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> wrote: but in exchange you broke all of 32-bit with CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y.
Which means you did not even build-test it on 32-bit, let alone boot
test it...
Why are we rushing so much to do 64-bit paravirt that we are breaking working configurations? If the developement is going to be this chaotic, it should be done and tested out of tree until it can stabilize. what you see is a open feedback cycle conducted on lkml. People send patches for arch/x86, and we tell them if it breaks something. The bug was found before i pushed out the x86.git devel tree (and the fix is below - but this shouldnt matter to you because the bug never hit a public x86.git tree). Ingo Do you want me to resend ? -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." | ||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-01-19 01:27 [W:10.568 / U:0.070 seconds] ©2003-2005 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||