![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
Anybody? Should I make just the shortlogs available instead (I don't save
those, but I post those for the later -rc's - usually the -rc1 and -rc2's
are too big for the mailing list, but they are still a lot smaller and
more readable than the *full* logs are)?
Or do people really want the full logs, and don't use git? The changelogs would be more useful if they were indexed by google, but it seems they aren't (maybe too big, since 2.4 and 2.6.16 changelogs are indexed ?). At least having the shortlog available would be a minimum, provided that we try to keep the most possible descriptive subjects. This also means being more transparent about security fixes. Willy | ||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-07-09 05:02 [W:0.526 / U:0.030 seconds] ©2003-2005 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||