lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS-feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Complete thread (EXPERIMENTAL)
/
DateSun, 9 Oct 2005 16:38:07 +0800
FromCoywolf Qi Hunt <>
SubjectRe: "stable" vs "security stable"
Digg This
On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:44:38 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said:
On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:

It is "security stable". Let's take this new notation from now on. "Security Stable" doesn't have to be all security related.

Tell you what - you convince the -stable team, and I'll go along with it..

Better be "stable" and "base". 2.6.13.3 is the latest stable, 2.6.13 is the latest base.

(you want stable@kernel.org to replace security@kernel.org too?)

You're the one who called it "security stable" ;)

My fault. I didn't realise stable@kernel.org exist, and CCed the wrong list security@kernel.org.


What you did is so stupid to me to to use -R every time. -R implies something wrong, and need to revert.

Umm... my diff had *lower case* -r (recursive), not -R (revert)...

I mean `patch -R'.
--
Coywolf Qi Hunt
http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/
\
ISP Services
Valid XHTML 1.0!\ /
Valid CSS! Last update: 2005-10-09 08:41    [W:0.112 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2005 Jasper Spaans