![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread Complete thread (EXPERIMENTAL) |
Rik> Wouldn't it be better to simply take the soft limit down to
Rik> min(new_rlim.rlim_cur, new_rlim.rlim_max) ?
Single unix spec says to return EINVAL in this case. [EINVAL] An invalid resource was specified; or in a setrlimit() call, the new rlim_cur exceeds the new rlim_max. So how about "the old rlim_cur exceeds the new rlim_max" ? ;) Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a> | ||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [W:1.178 / U:0.000 seconds] ©2003-2005 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||