![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread Complete thread (EXPERIMENTAL) |
Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org> wrote: I guess it would really be a great help if someone did tests like Cons'
"overall performance" ones for network performance explicitly. Like e.g.
performance for various packet-sizes of all available protocol types,
possibly including NAT connections. We have no comparable figures at hand
right now, I guess.
Why not ? I've often been doing this to check the reliability of the network layer of kernels that I distribute. I often use Tux for this, because it can easily sustain 10k hits/s during months. This is unfortunately not sufficient, not even close to. If you really want to have a good idea what is going on you should as well check out what is happening with packet sizes a lot smaller than 1500 (normal mtu). Check data rate an packet loss with packet sizes around 80 bytes or so to get an idea what bothers us :-) -- Regards, Stephan | ||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [W:0.255 / U:0.320 seconds] ©2003-2005 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||