lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS-feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Complete thread (EXPERIMENTAL)
/
DateTue, 03 Dec 2002 09:45:53 +0100
FromGiacomo Catenazzi <>
SubjectRe: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9
Digg This


H. Peter Anvin wrote:

While we're talking about printk()... is there any reason *not* to rename it printf()?

kprintf would be better, maybe addind the first argument for verbosity level, instead of being "inlined" in the string. But it is a 2.7 change!
ciao
giacomo

\
ISP Services
Valid XHTML 1.0!\ /
Valid CSS! Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31    [W:0.153 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2005 Jasper Spaans