![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread Complete thread (EXPERIMENTAL) |
Interesting - so the first stage in reporting a bug would be to select
the latest 2.4 and 2.5 kernels that you've noticed it in, and get a
list of known bugs fixed in those versions. Also, if you'd selected
the maintainer, (from an automatically generated list from the
MAINTAINERS file), it could just search *their* changes in the changelog.
It's often difficult to pick a maintainer for a bug - it may not be the
fault of a single subsystem.Yes, that's true. or maybe it's just difficult to tell which subsystem has a problem... As an example, I recently had a problem getting USB and network to
function (on kernels 2.5.5x).
I noticed that toggling Local APIC would also toggle which of the two devices worked. Disabling ACPI allows both deviecs to function regardless of local APIC. So, where is the problem? 1) Network driver? It doesn't work with ACPI and both Local APIC and IO-APIC. 2) USB driver? It doesn't work with ACPI and no UP APIC. 3) APIC? Causes weird problems with various drivers when ACPI is turned on. 4) ACPI? Causes weird problems with various drivers when APIC is toggled. The way I imagine it working would be that you could assign it to multiple maintainers, (perhaps with a maximum to discourage the sending of all bugs to everybody, or alternatively, you could lower the priority of a bug sent to multiple people, on the basis that it was more likely to get solved anyway, so you are, in effect, balancing out the attention it gets). In the case you point out, as it's primarily networking and USB, the bug would get assigned to Andrew Morton, Jeff Garzik, and Greg Kroah-Hartman, who would all be relevant people to contact. Hm, I see this problem as more of a generic interrupt routing or ACPI problem, not networking or USB. (this exact bug was in Bugzilla, though I hadn't checked there before
mailing lkml ;)
I'm not exactly a neophyte to the kernel, and I would have to do a lot more digging to find the right maintainer to send this to. Also, the person(s) to whom the bug is reported will depend on how much debugging work I do, and in what order I do it. Good point. I'm not trying to discourage you - just raising a potential gotcha.
Overall, though, would you rather be presented with a list of categories, or a list of people and what parts of the code they maintain. Personally, I think that a list of people is more intuitive, rather than an abstract list of categories, but I could be wrong. Do we have anyone targeted for interrupt routing problems (PIC, IO APIC, ACPI, etc.)? -- ~Randy | ||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [W:0.433 / U:0.310 seconds] ©2003-2005 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||