![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread Complete thread (EXPERIMENTAL) |
>>I do agree on this. This is a common complaint about linux kernel developers. And this always gives an insecure feeling :-) for the device driver or kernel module programmers. This was one of the issues in my earlier company/work and they have gone for another OS. Warm Regards Arun "Michael Richardson" wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "Donald" == Donald Becker writes: Donald> The drivers in the kernel are now heavily modified and have significantly Donald> diverged from my version. Sure, you are fine with having someone else Donald> do the difficult and unrewarding debugging and maintainence work, while Donald> you work on just the latest cool hardware, change the interfaces and are Donald> concerned only with the current kernel version. I agree strongly with Donald. Interfaces should NEVER change in patch level versions. Just *DO NOT DO IT*. Go wild in odd-numbered.. get the interfaces right there. But leave them alone afterward. This is a fundamental tenant of being professional. Otherwise, the kernel people are the biggest reason I've ever seen for using *BSD. Microsoft is not the real enemy. Gratuitous change is. ] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ ] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com Buy the best in Movies at http://www.videos.indiatimes.com Change the way you talk. Indiatimes presents Valufon, Your PC to Phone service with clear voice at rates far less than the normal ISD rates. Go to http://www.valufon.indiatimes.com. Choose your plan. BUY NOW. | ||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [W:0.423 / U:8.880 seconds] ©2003-2005 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||