![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread Complete thread (EXPERIMENTAL) |
Daniel Phillips wrote:
On January 7, 2002 03:13 pm, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
Of course fs which are not adapted would still just work with the fs_i()
and fs_sb() macros and/or using two separate pointers.
Yes, the fs_* macros are the really critical part of all this. I'd like to get them in early, while we hash out the rest of it. I think Jeff supports me in this, possibly Al as well. agreed, from my side OK, are we agreed that: - We're waiting for Al to merge ext/*alloc.c changes- When that's done we will apply what would be my unbork patches (2: ext2_i) and (3: ext2_sb) to both 2.4.current and 2.5.current? Subject to getting these two patches into the form everybody likes, of course. - We have some time in the interim to figure out how best to unbork fs.h, but we all agree it needs to be done soon. -- Daniel | ||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:15 [W:0.659 / U:0.050 seconds] ©2003-2005 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||