lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [syzbot] [ext4?] WARNING in mb_cache_destroy
From
On 2024/5/2 18:33, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 30-04-24 08:04:03, syzbot wrote:
>> syzbot has bisected this issue to:
>>
>> commit 67d7d8ad99beccd9fe92d585b87f1760dc9018e3
>> Author: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
>> Date: Thu Jun 16 02:13:56 2022 +0000
>>
>> ext4: fix use-after-free in ext4_xattr_set_entry
> So I'm not sure the bisect is correct since the change is looking harmless.
> But it is sufficiently related that there indeed may be some relationship.
> Anyway, the kernel log has:
>
> [ 44.932900][ T1063] EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_evict_inode:297: xattr delete (err -12)
> [ 44.943316][ T1063] EXT4-fs (loop0): unmounting filesystem.
> [ 44.949531][ T1063] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 44.955050][ T1063] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1063 at fs/mbcache.c:409 mb_cache_destroy+0xda/0x110
>
> So ext4_xattr_delete_inode() called when removing inode has failed with
> ENOMEM and later mb_cache_destroy() was eventually complaining about having
> mbcache entry with increased refcount. So likely some error cleanup path is
> forgetting to drop mbcache entry reference somewhere but at this point I
> cannot find where. We'll likely need to play with the reproducer to debug
> that. Baokun, any chance for looking into this?
>
> Honza

Hi Honza,

Sorry for the late reply, the first two days were May Day holidays.
Thanks for the heads up, I'll take a look at this soon.

Regards,
Baokun

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-03 03:55    [W:2.665 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site