Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Xu Roland <> | Subject | 回复: [PATCH] rust: kernel: make impl has w ork compatible with more complex generics | Date | Wed, 22 May 2024 13:24:47 +0000 |
| |
Alice Ryhl Wrote: > Please provide a more complete commit description. What user motivates > this change?
I sent two new emails but I thought I made something wrong cause It seems not consequent with this. And I found this issue at https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1077
________________________________________ 发件人: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> 发送时间: 2024年5月22日 20:37 收件人: mu001999 抄送: ojeda@kernel.org; boqun.feng@gmail.com; rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 主题: Re: [PATCH] rust: kernel: make impl_has_work compatible with more complex generics
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 2:27 PM mu001999 <mu001999@outlook.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: mu001999 <mu001999@outlook.com>
Please provide a more complete commit description. What user motivates this change?
> impl_has_work! { > - impl<T> HasWork<Self> for ClosureWork<T> { self.work } > + impl{T} HasWork<Self> for ClosureWork<T> { self.work } > }
I ended up doing something similar for the generics in some of the linked list patches. Does anyone know if it's possible to support this without giving up the <T> syntax?
Alice
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |