Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:51:55 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/insn_decoder_test: allow longer symbol-names | From | Danilo Krummrich <> |
| |
On 2/20/24 18:07, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:39 AM David Rheinsberg <david@readahead.eu> wrote: >> >> The current workaround is to just disable CONFIG_X86_DECODER_SELFTEST, which I thought is a sad state. I can gladly use `256 + KSYM_NAME_LEN` and add a comment ala "room for insn-encoding and a symbol name". Would that be acceptable? The alternative would be to try to dyn-alloc a buffer and increase it to the actual line-length? > > John independently hit this issue again. Could we fix this? Going for > the `256 + KSYM_NAME_LEN` sounds good enough for the moment since it > would be a clear improvement, though I agree this could be cleaned up > further.
I hit this independently as well. Miguel pointed me on this mail thread when I sent another fix for this in [1].
> > Sergio took the approach David suggested in a related patch [1], but > perhaps it is best to submit the fix on its own so that it is easier > to put it in. David, would you be so kind as to submit a v2 with that? > Hopefully x86 can pick it up, otherwise with an Acked-by I am happy to > take it too; and then Sergio can submit his patch on top again.
Sergio, David: Do you intend to follow up on this? Otherwise, I can also pick this up and re-submit.
- Danilo
> > Thanks! > > (Cc'ing also Masami who wrote this originally) > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20231119180145.157455-1-sergio.collado@gmail.com/ > > Cheers, > Miguel
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240325174924.95899-2-dakr@redhat.com/
| |