Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:32:50 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood |
| |
Hi Jiri,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 7:37 AM Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org> wrote: > On 08. 04. 24, 7:32, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > On 08. 04. 24, 7:29, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> Many maintainers won't drop Cc: tags if they are there in the submitted > >> patch. So I agree with Andy that we should encourage folks not to add > >> them in the first place. > > > > But fix the docs first. > > > > I am personally not biased to any variant (as in: I don't care where CCs > > live in a patch). > > OTOH, as a submitter, it's a major PITA to carry CCs in notes (to have > those under the --- line). Esp. when I have patches in a queue for years.
(Good to discover I'm not the only one carrying Very Old Patches ;-)
> How do people handle that? (Like rebases on current kernel.)
Keep them under the --- line in the actual commits, just like your changelog? All of that is retained when rebasing.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68korg
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |