Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:40:45 +0300 | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Update the kernel documentation - add Return sections |
| |
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:33:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 4/5/24 8:27 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 09:10:09PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 4/4/24 2:27 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>> $ scripts/kernel-doc -v -none -Wall drivers/gpio/gpiolib* 2>&1 | grep -w warning | wc -l > >>> 67 > >>> > >>> Fix these by adding Return sections. While at it, make sure all of > >>> Return sections use the same style.
..
> >> I would use %true, %false, %NULL, %0, and %1 in a few places. > > > > Why? I specifically removed % from all of them, it's not so useful. > > Do we have, btw, generated HTML with these % as an example to see > > the difference. Maybe that helps to understand this better? > > The leading '%' just changes the font style of constants. > I don't know of any HTML that compares them.
I meant to compare the (HTML) render to see the difference, but you already explained that it adds/modifies <font> tag or so.
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |