Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:09:57 +0200 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] staging: pi433: Remove duplicated code using the "goto" error recovery scheme. |
| |
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:05:56PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > I suggest to use the summary phrase “Use common error handling code > in pi433_init()” instead. > > > > pi433_init had "unregister_chrdev" called twice. > > Remove it using goto statements. > > How do you think about to use the following change description? > > unregister_chrdev() was called in two if branches. > Thus add jump targets so that a bit of exception handling can be better > reused at the end of this function implementation. > > > … > v2->v3: > … > a seperate patch. > … > > Would you like to avoid a typo here? > > Regards, > Markus >
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
| |