| Date | Fri, 5 Apr 2024 11:10:28 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 13/15] sched/deadline: Make start_dl_timer callers more robust | From | Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <> |
| |
On 3/13/24 02:24, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: > For whatever reason, if start_dl_timer() returned 0 during replenish (it > did not start a new timer), then do not marked dl_defer_armed, because > we never really armed. > > Further, we need to cancel any old timers, > > This is similar to what dl_check_constrained_dl() does. > > Add some guardrails for such situations. > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Makes sense, added as part of the defer patch.
-- Daniel
|