lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kunit: Cover 'assert.c' with tests
From
On 4/29/24 22:26, Rae Moar wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 6:04 PM Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> There are multiple assertion formatting functions in the `assert.c`
>> file, which are not covered with tests yet. Implement the KUnit test
>> for these functions.
>>
>> The test consists of 11 test cases for the following functions:
>>
>> 1) 'is_literal'
>> 2) 'is_str_literal'
>> 3) 'kunit_assert_prologue', test case for multiple assert types
>> 4) 'kunit_assert_print_msg'
>> 5) 'kunit_unary_assert_format'
>> 6) 'kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format'
>> 7) 'kunit_binary_assert_format'
>> 8) 'kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format'
>> 9) 'kunit_binary_str_assert_format'
>> 10) 'kunit_assert_hexdump'
>> 11) 'kunit_mem_assert_format'
>>
>> The test aims at maximizing the branch coverage for the assertion
>> formatting functions. As you can see, it covers some of the static
>> helper functions as well, so we have to import the test source in the
>> `assert.c` file in order to be able to call and validate them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'll give this a full review tomorrow. But with a quick glance and
> test, this is looking good to me.
>
> Tested-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
>
> Thanks!
> -Rae

Hi Rae,

Thanks a lot for testing the patch.

Looking forward to seeing your review! :)

--
Kind regards,
Ivan Orlov


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 18:09    [W:0.050 / U:0.496 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site