Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Apr 2024 07:15:29 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/purgatory: Switch to the position-independent small code model | From | Jiri Slaby <> |
| |
Hi,
On 29. 04. 24, 14:05, Michael Matz wrote: > On Sat, 20 Apr 2024, Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> Interesting. I thought gcc doesn't have problems here yet and was >> talking to Matz on Thu about it and it seems he's forgotten about his >> statement too that "you should simply stop using -mcmodel=large. Noone >> should use it." :-) > > It may be so ingrained in my brain that I'm not _always_ saying it when > talking about the large code model over a beer. And indeed I know of no > particular problems with it vis GCC,
Of course you do :). That bsc#1211853 I linked earlier. I.e. gcc-13 + -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 + -mcmodel=large + some asm() expecting __FILE__ to be constant (not true with the large model).
regards, -- js suse labs
| |