Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | [PATCH 05/15] i2c: imx-lpi2c: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout() | Date | Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:35:57 +0200 |
| |
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...) if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code self explaining.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c index 36e8f6196a87..0197786892a2 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c @@ -307,11 +307,11 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_master_disable(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx) static int lpi2c_imx_msg_complete(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx) { - unsigned long timeout; + unsigned long time_left; - timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ); + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&lpi2c_imx->complete, HZ); - return timeout ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; + return time_left ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; } static int lpi2c_imx_txfifo_empty(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx) -- 2.43.0
| |