Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:25:09 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: k3_j72xx_bandgap: implement suspend/resume support | From | Thomas Richard <> |
| |
On 4/22/24 17:46, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 17/04/2024 14:03, Thomas Richard wrote: >> From: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com> >> >> This add suspend-to-ram support. >> >> The derived_table is kept-as is, so the resume is only about >> pm_runtime_* calls and restoring the same registers as the probe. >> >> Extract the hardware initialization procedure to a function called at >> both probe-time & resume-time. >> >> The probe-time loop is split in two to ensure doing the hardware >> initialization before registering thermal zones. That ensures our >> callbacks cannot be called while in bad state. >> >> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com> >> Acked-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@bootlin.com> >> --- >> >> v3: >> - Remove __maybe_unused attributes and use the magic of PTR_IF() > > Where are these changes ?
- I removed __maybe_unused attribute for k3_j72xx_bandgap_suspend() and k3_j72xx_bandgap_resume() - The DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS macro is used to declare k3_j72xx_bandgap_pm_ops. - The pm_sleep_ptr macro is used.
> >> v2: >> - Fix warnings/errors reported by kernel test robot >> >> drivers/thermal/k3_j72xx_bandgap.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/k3_j72xx_bandgap.c >> b/drivers/thermal/k3_j72xx_bandgap.c >> index c74094a86982..a7244e05ed5c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/thermal/k3_j72xx_bandgap.c >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/k3_j72xx_bandgap.c >> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ struct k3_j72xx_bandgap { >> void __iomem *base; >> void __iomem *cfg2_base; >> struct k3_thermal_data *ts_data[K3_VTM_MAX_NUM_TS]; >> + int cnt; >> }; >> /* common data structures */ >> @@ -338,24 +339,53 @@ static void print_look_up_table(struct device >> *dev, int *ref_table) >> dev_dbg(dev, "%d %d %d\n", i, derived_table[i], >> ref_table[i]); >> } >> +static void k3_j72xx_bandgap_init_hw(struct k3_j72xx_bandgap *bgp) >> +{ >> + struct k3_thermal_data *data; >> + int id, high_max, low_temp; >> + u32 val; >> + >> + for (id = 0; id < bgp->cnt; id++) { >> + data = bgp->ts_data[id]; >> + val = readl(bgp->cfg2_base + data->ctrl_offset); >> + val |= (K3_VTM_TMPSENS_CTRL_MAXT_OUTRG_EN | >> + K3_VTM_TMPSENS_CTRL_SOC | >> + K3_VTM_TMPSENS_CTRL_CLRZ | BIT(4)); >> + writel(val, bgp->cfg2_base + data->ctrl_offset); >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * Program TSHUT thresholds >> + * Step 1: set the thresholds to ~123C and 105C WKUP_VTM_MISC_CTRL2 >> + * Step 2: WKUP_VTM_TMPSENS_CTRL_j set the MAXT_OUTRG_EN bit >> + * This is already taken care as per of init >> + * Step 3: WKUP_VTM_MISC_CTRL set the ANYMAXT_OUTRG_ALERT_EN bit >> + */ >> + high_max = k3_j72xx_bandgap_temp_to_adc_code(MAX_TEMP); >> + low_temp = k3_j72xx_bandgap_temp_to_adc_code(COOL_DOWN_TEMP); >> + >> + writel((low_temp << 16) | high_max, bgp->cfg2_base + >> K3_VTM_MISC_CTRL2_OFFSET); >> + mdelay(100); > > 100ms ? > > Ok, I know you did not introduce this delay. But as it is a suspend / > resume, this delay will be called at each resume which is not acceptable > given its duration. > > Please, investigate a way to get rid of this delay
I talked to Keerthy, this delay was initially added to be sure the thresholds are programmed before enabling the interrupt. But for him, this delay is useless.
I did the test, I removed the delay and I didn't see any thermal events. So we can remove it. I'll send a new version without the delay, and I'll mention it in the commit message.
> > >> + writel(K3_VTM_ANYMAXT_OUTRG_ALERT_EN, bgp->cfg2_base + >> K3_VTM_MISC_CTRL_OFFSET); >> +} >> + >> struct k3_j72xx_bandgap_data { >> const bool has_errata_i2128; >> }; >> static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> { >> - int ret = 0, cnt, val, id; >> - int high_max, low_temp; >> - struct resource *res; >> + const struct k3_j72xx_bandgap_data *driver_data; >> + struct thermal_zone_device *ti_thermal; >> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> + bool workaround_needed = false; >> struct k3_j72xx_bandgap *bgp; >> struct k3_thermal_data *data; >> - bool workaround_needed = false; >> - const struct k3_j72xx_bandgap_data *driver_data; >> - struct thermal_zone_device *ti_thermal; >> - int *ref_table; >> struct err_values err_vals; >> void __iomem *fuse_base; >> + int ret = 0, val, id; >> + struct resource *res; >> + int *ref_table; > > No related to the changes but the patch is showing signs the driver > needs a code cleanup AFAICT > >> const s64 golden_factors[] = { >> -490019999999999936, >> @@ -422,10 +452,10 @@ static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> /* Get the sensor count in the VTM */ >> val = readl(bgp->base + K3_VTM_DEVINFO_PWR0_OFFSET); >> - cnt = val & K3_VTM_DEVINFO_PWR0_TEMPSENS_CT_MASK; >> - cnt >>= __ffs(K3_VTM_DEVINFO_PWR0_TEMPSENS_CT_MASK); >> + bgp->cnt = val & K3_VTM_DEVINFO_PWR0_TEMPSENS_CT_MASK; >> + bgp->cnt >>= __ffs(K3_VTM_DEVINFO_PWR0_TEMPSENS_CT_MASK); >> - data = devm_kcalloc(bgp->dev, cnt, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); >> + data = devm_kcalloc(bgp->dev, bgp->cnt, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!data) { >> ret = -ENOMEM; >> goto err_alloc; >> @@ -449,8 +479,8 @@ static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> else >> init_table(3, ref_table, pvt_wa_factors); >> - /* Register the thermal sensors */ >> - for (id = 0; id < cnt; id++) { >> + /* Precompute the derived table & fill each thermal sensor struct */ >> + for (id = 0; id < bgp->cnt; id++) { >> data[id].bgp = bgp; >> data[id].ctrl_offset = K3_VTM_TMPSENS0_CTRL_OFFSET + id * 0x20; >> data[id].stat_offset = data[id].ctrl_offset + >> @@ -470,13 +500,13 @@ static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> else if (id == 0 && !workaround_needed) >> memcpy(derived_table, ref_table, TABLE_SIZE * 4); >> - val = readl(data[id].bgp->cfg2_base + data[id].ctrl_offset); >> - val |= (K3_VTM_TMPSENS_CTRL_MAXT_OUTRG_EN | >> - K3_VTM_TMPSENS_CTRL_SOC | >> - K3_VTM_TMPSENS_CTRL_CLRZ | BIT(4)); >> - writel(val, data[id].bgp->cfg2_base + data[id].ctrl_offset); >> - >> bgp->ts_data[id] = &data[id]; >> + } >> + >> + k3_j72xx_bandgap_init_hw(bgp); >> + >> + /* Register the thermal sensors */ >> + for (id = 0; id < bgp->cnt; id++) { >> ti_thermal = devm_thermal_of_zone_register(bgp->dev, id, >> &data[id], >> &k3_of_thermal_ops); >> if (IS_ERR(ti_thermal)) { >> @@ -486,21 +516,7 @@ static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> } >> } >> - /* >> - * Program TSHUT thresholds >> - * Step 1: set the thresholds to ~123C and 105C WKUP_VTM_MISC_CTRL2 >> - * Step 2: WKUP_VTM_TMPSENS_CTRL_j set the MAXT_OUTRG_EN bit >> - * This is already taken care as per of init >> - * Step 3: WKUP_VTM_MISC_CTRL set the ANYMAXT_OUTRG_ALERT_EN bit >> - */ >> - high_max = k3_j72xx_bandgap_temp_to_adc_code(MAX_TEMP); >> - low_temp = k3_j72xx_bandgap_temp_to_adc_code(COOL_DOWN_TEMP); >> - >> - writel((low_temp << 16) | high_max, data[0].bgp->cfg2_base + >> - K3_VTM_MISC_CTRL2_OFFSET); >> - mdelay(100); >> - writel(K3_VTM_ANYMAXT_OUTRG_ALERT_EN, data[0].bgp->cfg2_base + >> - K3_VTM_MISC_CTRL_OFFSET); >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bgp); >> print_look_up_table(dev, ref_table); >> /* >> @@ -527,6 +543,35 @@ static void k3_j72xx_bandgap_remove(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); >> } >> +static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev); >> + pm_runtime_disable(dev); >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int k3_j72xx_bandgap_resume(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct k3_j72xx_bandgap *bgp = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + int ret; >> + >> + pm_runtime_enable(dev); >> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); >> + pm_runtime_disable(dev); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + k3_j72xx_bandgap_init_hw(bgp); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(k3_j72xx_bandgap_pm_ops, >> + k3_j72xx_bandgap_suspend, >> + k3_j72xx_bandgap_resume); >> + >> static const struct k3_j72xx_bandgap_data >> k3_j72xx_bandgap_j721e_data = { >> .has_errata_i2128 = true, >> }; >> @@ -554,6 +599,7 @@ static struct platform_driver >> k3_j72xx_bandgap_sensor_driver = { >> .driver = { >> .name = "k3-j72xx-soc-thermal", >> .of_match_table = of_k3_j72xx_bandgap_match, >> + .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&k3_j72xx_bandgap_pm_ops), >> }, >> }; >> > -- Thomas Richard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
| |