lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ibmvnic: Use -EBUSY in __ibmvnic_reset()
From
Date
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 16:08 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:46:17 +0200
>
> Add a minus sign before the error code “EBUSY”
> so that a negative value will be used as in other cases.
>
> This issue was transformed by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> index 5e9a93bdb518..737ae83a836a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> @@ -3212,7 +3212,7 @@ static void __ibmvnic_reset(struct work_struct *work)
> adapter->state == VNIC_REMOVED) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
> kfree(rwi);
> - rc = EBUSY;
> + rc = -EBUSY;
> break;
>

AFAICS the error is always used as bool, so this will not change any
behavior in practice. I tend to think we should not merge this kind of
change outside some larger work in the same area, but I'd love a second
opinion from the driver owners.

Thanks,

Paolo
> }



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 17:58    [W:0.073 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site