Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:24:45 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: regulator: pca9450: add restart handler priority | From | Holger Assmann <> |
| |
Hello Krzysztof,
also thanks for the feedback on this one.
Am 19.04.24 um 15:39 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > > Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for > example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory > your patch is touching.
Short note: I did that prior submitting, but I did it directly for the yaml-file and not for the directory - Those do not look the same regarding their prefix scheme.
I will change it for my v2 and use a subject like for the directory.
> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml >> index 3d469b8e97748..7cc2d6636cf52 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml >> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ properties: >> interrupts: >> maxItems: 1 >> >> + priority: >> + $ref: /schemas/power/reset/restart-handler.yaml# > > You defined object, which is not explained in commit msg. This code does > not look correct or it does not implement what you said. > > Please look at existing code - do you see anything like this? No, there > is no such code and this should raise question.
I am a bit lost on that one to be honest.
The only other instances where a "priority" for restart handling is described are "gpio-poweroff.yaml" and "syscon-reboot.yaml". These files are dedicated documentation for the reset bindings, so I tried to transfer the respective entry over for my commit.
Do you suggest I should replace
+ priority: + $ref: /schemas/power/reset/restart-handler.yaml#
with
+allOf: + - $ref: /schemas/power/reset/restart-handler.yaml#
in order to properly include the context for the restart handling? Running dt_binding_check does not indicate an issue with any of those two.
> > You probably want to annotate that device is a restart handler?
You mean by adding to the "description" part of the file?
Kind regards, Holger
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Holger Assmann | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
| |