lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v19 118/130] KVM: TDX: Add methods to ignore accesses to CPU state
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 06:04:10PM +0800,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 2/26/2024 4:27 PM, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
> >
> > TDX protects TDX guest state from VMM. Implement access methods for TDX
> > guest state to ignore them or return zero. Because those methods can be
> > called by kvm ioctls to set/get cpu registers, they don't have KVM_BUG_ON
> > except one method.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 48 +++++-
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h | 13 ++
> > 3 files changed, 321 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> > index 84d2dc818cf7..9fb3f28d8259 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> > @@ -375,6 +375,200 @@ static void vt_vcpu_deliver_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > kvm_vcpu_deliver_init(vcpu);
> > }
> > +static void vt_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + if (is_td_vcpu(vcpu))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + vmx_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(vcpu);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vt_update_exception_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + if (is_td_vcpu(vcpu))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + vmx_update_exception_bitmap(vcpu);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u64 vt_get_segment_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int seg)
> > +{
> > + if (is_td_vcpu(vcpu))
> > + return tdx_get_segment_base(vcpu, seg);
> Could just return 0?
> Not need to add a function, since it's only called here and it's more
> straight forward to read the code without jump to the definition of these
> functions.
>
> Similarly, we can use open code for tdx_get_cpl(), tdx_get_rflags() and
> tdx_get_segment(), which return 0 or memset with 0.

Yes, we should drop them. They came from the TDX guest debug. But right now
we drop the support and we have guard with vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected.

guest debug is a future topic now.
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-04-19 20:09    [W:1.290 / U:0.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site