lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 09/10] media: subdev: Support single-stream case in v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams()
Hi Tomi,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 04:55:12PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> At the moment the v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams() functions call
> fallback helpers to handle the case where the subdev only implements
> .s_stream(), and the main function handles the case where the subdev
> implements streams (V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_STREAMS, which implies
> .enable/disable_streams()).
>
> What is missing is support for subdevs which do not implement streams
> support, but do implement .enable/disable_streams(). Example cases of
> these subdevices are single-stream cameras, where using
> .enable/disable_streams() is not required but helps us remove the users
> of the legacy .s_stream(), and subdevices with multiple source pads (but
> single stream per pad), where .enable/disable_streams() allows the
> subdevice to control the enable/disable state per pad.
>
> The two single-streams cases (.s_stream() and .enable/disable_streams())
> are very similar, and with small changes we can change the
> v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams() functions to support all three
> cases, without needing separate fallback functions.
>
> A few potentially problematic details, though:
>
> - For the single-streams cases we use sd->enabled_pads field, which
> limits the number of pads for the subdevice to 64. For simplicity I
> added the check for this limitation to the beginning of the function,
> and it also applies to the streams case.
>
> - The fallback functions only allowed the target pad to be a source pad.
> It is not very clear to me why this check was needed, but it was not
> needed in the streams case. However, I doubt the
> v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams() code has ever been tested with
> sink pads, so to be on the safe side, I added the same check
> to the v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams() functions.
>

Now that v4l2_subdev_enable_streams() is usable by (almost) every
driver, should we update documentation to indicate that manual calls to
s_stream() should be avoided ?

> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 187 ++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> index e45fd42da1e3..10406acfb9d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> @@ -2106,6 +2106,13 @@ static void v4l2_subdev_collect_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> u64 *found_streams,
> u64 *enabled_streams)
> {
> + if (!(sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_STREAMS)) {
> + *found_streams = BIT_ULL(0);
> + *enabled_streams =
> + (sd->enabled_pads & BIT_ULL(pad)) ? BIT_ULL(0) : 0;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> *found_streams = 0;
> *enabled_streams = 0;
>
> @@ -2127,6 +2134,14 @@ static void v4l2_subdev_set_streams_enabled(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> u32 pad, u64 streams_mask,
> bool enabled)
> {
> + if (!(sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_STREAMS)) {
> + if (enabled)
> + sd->enabled_pads |= BIT_ULL(pad);
> + else
> + sd->enabled_pads &= ~BIT_ULL(pad);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> for (unsigned int i = 0; i < state->stream_configs.num_configs; ++i) {
> struct v4l2_subdev_stream_config *cfg =
> &state->stream_configs.configs[i];
> @@ -2136,51 +2151,6 @@ static void v4l2_subdev_set_streams_enabled(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> }
> }
>
> -static int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams_fallback(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> - u64 streams_mask)
> -{
> - struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev;
> - int ret;
> -
> - /*
> - * The subdev doesn't implement pad-based stream enable, fall back
> - * to the .s_stream() operation.
> - */
> - if (!(sd->entity.pads[pad].flags & MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> - /*
> - * .s_stream() means there is no streams support, so the only allowed
> - * stream is the implicit stream 0.
> - */
> - if (streams_mask != BIT_ULL(0))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> - /*
> - * We use a 64-bit bitmask for tracking enabled pads, so only subdevices
> - * with 64 pads or less can be supported.
> - */
> - if (pad >= sizeof(sd->enabled_pads) * BITS_PER_BYTE)
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> - if (sd->enabled_pads & BIT_ULL(pad)) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "pad %u already enabled on %s\n",
> - pad, sd->entity.name);
> - return -EALREADY;
> - }
> -
> - /* Start streaming when the first pad is enabled. */
> - if (!sd->enabled_pads) {
> - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, s_stream, 1);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - sd->enabled_pads |= BIT_ULL(pad);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> u64 streams_mask)
> {
> @@ -2189,21 +2159,33 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> bool already_streaming;
> u64 enabled_streams;
> u64 found_streams;
> + bool use_s_stream;
> int ret;
>
> /* A few basic sanity checks first. */
> if (pad >= sd->entity.num_pads)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (!(sd->entity.pads[pad].flags & MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + /*
> + * We use a 64-bit bitmask for tracking enabled pads, so only subdevices
> + * with 64 pads or less can be supported.
> + */
> + if (pad >= sizeof(sd->enabled_pads) * BITS_PER_BYTE)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> if (!streams_mask)
> return 0;
>
> /* Fallback on .s_stream() if .enable_streams() isn't available. */
> - if (!v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, pad, enable_streams))
> - return v4l2_subdev_enable_streams_fallback(sd, pad,
> - streams_mask);
> + use_s_stream = !v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, pad, enable_streams);
>
> - state = v4l2_subdev_lock_and_get_active_state(sd);
> + if (!use_s_stream)
> + state = v4l2_subdev_lock_and_get_active_state(sd);
> + else
> + state = NULL;
>
> /*
> * Verify that the requested streams exist and that they are not
> @@ -2231,9 +2213,18 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>
> already_streaming = v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd);
>
> - /* Call the .enable_streams() operation. */
> - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, enable_streams, state, pad,
> - streams_mask);
> + if (!use_s_stream) {
> + /* Call the .enable_streams() operation. */
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, enable_streams, state, pad,
> + streams_mask);
> + } else {
> + /* Start streaming when the first pad is enabled. */
> + if (!already_streaming)
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, s_stream, 1);
> + else
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +
> if (ret) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "enable streams %u:%#llx failed: %d\n", pad,
> streams_mask, ret);
> @@ -2243,34 +2234,32 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> /* Mark the streams as enabled. */
> v4l2_subdev_set_streams_enabled(sd, state, pad, streams_mask, true);

state gets set to a non-null value above if the subdev has an
enable_streams operation, while in v4l2_subdev_set_streams_enabled(),
you use it if the V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_STREAMS flag is set. The second
condition is a subset of the first one, so it should be safe now, but I
wonder if we're at risk of crashes in the future when reworking the
code. I'm probably worrying needlessly.

>
> - if (!already_streaming)
> + if (!use_s_stream && !already_streaming)
> v4l2_subdev_enable_privacy_led(sd);

Once everybody switches to v4l2_subdev_enable_streams() (am I dreaming?)
we should move LED handling from the .s_stream() wrapper to here for the
fallback case too. How about a TODO comment ?

>
> done:
> - v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
> + if (!use_s_stream)

if (state)

would be better I think.

> + v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
>
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(v4l2_subdev_enable_streams);
>
> -static int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams_fallback(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> - u64 streams_mask)
> +int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> + u64 streams_mask)
> {
> struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev;
> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state;
> + u64 enabled_streams;
> + u64 found_streams;
> + bool use_s_stream;
> int ret;
>
> - /*
> - * If the subdev doesn't implement pad-based stream enable, fall back
> - * to the .s_stream() operation.
> - */
> - if (!(sd->entity.pads[pad].flags & MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + /* A few basic sanity checks first. */
> + if (pad >= sd->entity.num_pads)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - /*
> - * .s_stream() means there is no streams support, so the only allowed
> - * stream is the implicit stream 0.
> - */
> - if (streams_mask != BIT_ULL(0))
> + if (!(sd->entity.pads[pad].flags & MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> /*
> @@ -2280,46 +2269,16 @@ static int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams_fallback(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> if (pad >= sizeof(sd->enabled_pads) * BITS_PER_BYTE)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - if (!(sd->enabled_pads & BIT_ULL(pad))) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "pad %u already disabled on %s\n",
> - pad, sd->entity.name);
> - return -EALREADY;
> - }
> -
> - /* Stop streaming when the last streams are disabled. */
> - if (!(sd->enabled_pads & ~BIT_ULL(pad))) {
> - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, s_stream, 0);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - sd->enabled_pads &= ~BIT_ULL(pad);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> - u64 streams_mask)
> -{
> - struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev;
> - struct v4l2_subdev_state *state;
> - u64 enabled_streams;
> - u64 found_streams;
> - int ret;
> -
> - /* A few basic sanity checks first. */
> - if (pad >= sd->entity.num_pads)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> if (!streams_mask)
> return 0;
>
> /* Fallback on .s_stream() if .disable_streams() isn't available. */
> - if (!v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, pad, disable_streams))
> - return v4l2_subdev_disable_streams_fallback(sd, pad,
> - streams_mask);
> + use_s_stream = !v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, pad, disable_streams);
>
> - state = v4l2_subdev_lock_and_get_active_state(sd);
> + if (!use_s_stream)
> + state = v4l2_subdev_lock_and_get_active_state(sd);
> + else
> + state = NULL;
>
> /*
> * Verify that the requested streams exist and that they are not
> @@ -2345,9 +2304,19 @@ int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "disable streams %u:%#llx\n", pad, streams_mask);
>
> - /* Call the .disable_streams() operation. */
> - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, disable_streams, state, pad,
> - streams_mask);
> + if (!use_s_stream) {
> + /* Call the .disable_streams() operation. */
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, disable_streams, state, pad,
> + streams_mask);
> + } else {
> + /* Stop streaming when the last streams are disabled. */
> +
> + if (!(sd->enabled_pads & ~BIT_ULL(pad)))
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, s_stream, 0);
> + else
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +
> if (ret) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "disable streams %u:%#llx failed: %d\n", pad,
> streams_mask, ret);
> @@ -2357,10 +2326,12 @@ int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> v4l2_subdev_set_streams_enabled(sd, state, pad, streams_mask, false);
>
> done:
> - if (!v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd))
> - v4l2_subdev_disable_privacy_led(sd);
> + if (!use_s_stream) {
> + if (!v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd))
> + v4l2_subdev_disable_privacy_led(sd);

Do we want to disable the privacy LED on failure in all cases, in
particular when the .s_stream() or .disable_streams() operations are not
even called ?

And now that I wrote that, I realize the !v4l2_subdev_is_streaming()
condition will not be true if the operations failed, so it should be
fine.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

>
> - v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
> + v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
>

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-04-19 17:36    [W:0.153 / U:2.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site