lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/19] amba: store owner from modules with amba_driver_register()
From
On 16/04/2024 12:41, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> + Greg
>
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 30/03/2024 18:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 30/03/2024 18:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:23:30 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> Merging
>>>> =======
>>>> All further patches depend on the first amba patch, therefore please ack
>>>> and this should go via one tree.
>>>>
>>>> Description
>>>> ===========
>>>> Modules registering driver with amba_driver_register() often forget to
>>>> set .owner field.
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>
>>> [01/19] amba: store owner from modules with amba_driver_register()
>>> (no commit info)
>>
>> Patchset applied here:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux-dt.git/log/?h=for-v6.10/module-owner-amba
>
> How do you plan to push this ? Given this affects most of the drivers/,
> do you plan to send this to Greg ? We have changes in the coresight
> tree that would conflict with this "tag" ( I haven't merged them yet,
> but is in my local queue). I want to make sure we can avoid the
> conflicts. I am happy to merge this to my local tree and base the
> changes on this, if this is going in for v6.10 and all are in agreement.

I pushed it to arm-linux patches but it hasn't been picked up.

I propose you take entire set then.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-04-17 15:30    [W:0.232 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site