| Date | Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:42:25 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 02/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Add new macros to work with (vendor/family/model) values | From | Amadeusz Sławiński <> |
| |
On 4/16/2024 11:19 PM, Tony Luck wrote: > To avoid adding a slew of new macros for each new Intel CPU family > switch over from providing CPU model number #defines to a new > scheme that encodes vendor, family, and model in a single number. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h > index bf4e065cf1e2..833f230aeafc 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h > @@ -2,6 +2,39 @@ > #ifndef _ASM_X86_CPU_DEVICE_ID > #define _ASM_X86_CPU_DEVICE_ID > > +/* > + * Can't use <linux/bitfield.h> because it generates expressions that > + * cannot be used in structure initializers. Bitfield construction > + * here must match the union in struct cpuinfo_86:
Typo: cpuinfo_86 -> cpuinfo_x86
|