Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:18:01 +0200 | From | Lukas Wunner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: tpm: Add st,st33ktpm2xi2c to TCG TIS binding |
| |
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:10:49AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for > example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory > your patch is touching.
To be fair, "dt-bindings: tpm: " is actually the only prefix used so far for the file that's touched here:
$ git log --oneline Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml 26c9d15 dt-bindings: tpm: Consolidate TCG TIS bindings
Personally I don't think we need to differentiate between spi/i2c/mmio bindings in the prefix, so the prefix used by Michael seems fine.
> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding". The "dt-bindings" > prefix is already stating that these are bindings. > See also: > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
Right, so maybe just:
dt-bindings: tpm: Add st,st33ktpm2xi2c
?
> I got only one patch, but if these are compatible, why do you need > second patch? Plus binding come before users.
Right, the order of the patches needs to be reversed it seems.
Thanks,
Lukas
| |