lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] soc: qcom: Move some socinfo defines to the header, expand them
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:24:08PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 4/11/24 22:09, Elliot Berman wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:05:30PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/11/24 20:55, Elliot Berman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 10:41:29AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > > > > In preparation for parsing the chip "feature code" (FC) and "product
> > > > > code" (PC) (essentially the parameters that let us conclusively
> > > > > characterize the sillicon we're running on, including various speed
> > > > > bins), move the socinfo version defines to the public header and
> > > > > include some more FC/PC defines.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > 0xf is the last one.
>
> One more question, are the "internal/external feature codes" referring to
> internality/externality of the chips (i.e. "are they QC-lab-only engineering
> samples), or what else does that represent?

Yes, QC-lab-only engineering samples is the right interpretation of
these feature codes.

Thanks,
Elliot


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 16:36    [W:0.078 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site