Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:29:40 +0200 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] docs: stable-kernel-rules: mention "no semi-automatic backport" |
| |
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:25:04AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Some developers deliberately steer clear of 'Fixes:' tags to prevent > changes from being backported semi-automatically by the stable team. > That somewhat undermines the reason for the existence of the Fixes: tag, > hence point out there is an alternative to reach the same effect. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/dfd87673-c581-4b4b-b37a-1cf5c817240d@leemhuis.info/ > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> > --- > Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst > index 7bb16d42a51833..ebd57cb9277f7b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst > @@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ comment to pass arbitrary or predefined notes: > Note, such tagging is unnecessary if the stable team can derive the > appropriate versions from Fixes: tags. > > + * Prevent semi-automatic backporting of changes carrying a 'Fixes:' tag: > + > + .. code-block:: none > + > + Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # no semi-automatic backport
I do not understand, why are you saying "cc: stable" here if you do NOT want it backported?
And what do you mean by "semi-automatic"?
confused,
greg k-h
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |