Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Jonathan Corbet <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: *-regressions.rst: unify quoting, add missing word | Date | Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:03:29 -0600 |
| |
"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info> writes:
> On 28.03.24 20:29, Karel Balej wrote: >> Quoting of the '"no regressions" rule' expression differs between >> occurrences, sometimes being presented as '"no regressions rule"'. Unify >> the quoting using the first form which seems semantically correct or is >> at least used dominantly, albeit marginally. >> >> One of the occurrences is obviously missing the 'rule' part -- add it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Karel Balej <balejk@matfyz.cz> > > Thx for this: > > Reviewed-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
I've applied this patch; part 2, it seems, is subject to further work so I have not applied that one.
Thanks,
jon
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |