Messages in this thread | | | From | Sebastian Reichel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move temperature reading out of update loop | Date | Mon, 01 Apr 2024 14:48:10 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:31:24 -0500, Andrew Davis wrote: > Most of the functions that read values return a status and put the value > itself in an a function parameter. Update temperature reading to match. > > As temp is not checked for changes as part of the update loop, remove > the read of the temperature from the periodic update loop. This saves > I2C/1W bandwidth. It also means we do not have to cache it, fresh > values are read when requested. > > [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move temperature reading out of update loop commit: c32c617de8076d8fb2a16a4a2f3b5da5f3df398d [2/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move time reading out of update loop commit: 651a620aa4d49f5647e21e55fc71bb049bc03389 [3/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move charge reading out of update loop commit: 8d846335204f25a2247e5e88e39e1604b6ecc133 [4/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move energy reading out of update loop commit: 39cf1c4cd03254218a23ef955bd534e19328f618 [5/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move cycle count reading out of update loop commit: 656489ac90f25f92190a1dd5c4e5c5293bd70323 [6/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move health reading out of update loop commit: 50f0ff7c8cc4c1d10fabc4b3b3f3b9e942b08187
Best regards, -- Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
| |