lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 7/8] tpm: tis-i2c: Add more compatible strings
From
Hi Conor,

On 1/9/24 11:14, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 02:05:53PM -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote:
>> Hello Guenter,
>>
>> On 12/12/23 13:50, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 12/12/23 10:51, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:00:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:15:51PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:40:03AM -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The NPCT75x TPM is TIS compatible. It has an I2C and SPI interface.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.nuvoton.com/products/cloud-computing/security/trusted-platform-module-tpm/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Add a compatible string for it, and the generic compatible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 3
>>>>>> Delete this from every patch that it appears from.
>>
>> I have send it as a separate commit. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20231214144954.3833998-1-ninad@linux.ibm.com/
> Why did you do that? It now just adds undocumented compatibles to the
> driver. Please, as Rob requested, work with Lukas on his series to make
> sure that these devices are documented.

I think krzysztof kozlowski suggested to send these patches separately:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/1c5ace65-2fd8-4503-b22f-e0f564d1c83f@linaro.org/

Did I misunderstood it? Do you guys want me to include that commit again?

Regards,

Ninad

>
> Thanks,
> Conor.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-01-10 00:57    [W:0.119 / U:2.960 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site