lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: timer: atmel,at91sam9260-pit: convert to yaml
Date
On 09.06.2023 13:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

[ ... ]

>
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + clocks:
>>>> + minItems: 2
>>>> + clock-names:
>>>> + items:
>>>> + - const: pclk
>>>> + - const: gclk
>>>
>>> interrupts? They are still required, so why no description here?
>>
>> It was here in the previous versions but Conor suggested to remove it as it
>> was nothing specific about this description. For the if-then branch I kept
>> it to specify that the interrupt is share with other devices. In this
>> branch the interrupt is only for the timer itself. With this, would you
>> still prefer to add it back?
>
> I just don't understand why interrupts are in one arm of the if: and not
> in the other.
>

As previously mentioned, Conor suggested to have it like this.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-06-09 14:12    [W:0.099 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site