lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf: arm_cspmu: Support 32-bit accesses to 64-bit registers
From
On 2023-06-01 04:01, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> Split the 64-bit register accesses if 64-bit access is not supported
> by the PMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index a3f1c410b417..88547a2b73e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -701,8 +701,12 @@ static void arm_cspmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u64 val)
>
> if (use_64b_counter_reg(cspmu)) {
> offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u64), event->hw.idx);
> -
> - writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
> + if (!cspmu->impl.split_64bit_access) {

Could we not just hang this off the 64-bit atomicity property to match
the read path? It doesn't seem like there's much benefit in
micro-optimising for whether the interconnect splits 64-bit accesses
into 32-bit bursts vs. just not accepting them at all.

> + writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
> + } else {
> + writel(lower_32_bits(val), cspmu->base1 + offset);
> + writel(upper_32_bits(val), cspmu->base1 + offset + 4);

lo_hi_writeq() - the header's already included for 32-bit build
coverage, so we may as well put it to use :)

Thanks,
Robin.

> + }
> } else {
> offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u32), event->hw.idx);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> index 51323b175a4a..c0412cf2bd97 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops {
> /* Vendor/implementer descriptor. */
> struct arm_cspmu_impl {
> u32 pmiidr;
> + bool split_64bit_access;
> struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops ops;
> void *ctx;
> };

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-06-01 16:49    [W:0.086 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site