lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mt65xx: add additional clocks
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 06:54:01PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 31/05/2023 18:10, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Add pck and mck clocks which are needed to access I2C registers on MT7981.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.yaml | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.yaml
> > index fda0467cdd954..550795f6573c5 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mt65xx.yaml
> > @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ properties:
> > - const: dma
> > - const: arb
> > - const: pmic
> > + - const: mck
> > + - const: pck
> >
>
> Adding names does not magically add the clocks. This wasn't tested.

Adding the clocks is done in patch 2/2 which just wasn't sent to
devicetree@ and dt maintainers, but to the relevant mailing lists
instead. Was that wrong and should I always send the complete series
also to devicetree@ as well as dt maintainers?

Anyway. It turns out that arb and pmic clocks are intended for that,
so we can cancel this and I'll just use those instead.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-06-01 21:11    [W:0.048 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site