Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/10] sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF like policy | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Thu, 09 Mar 2023 17:24:21 +0100 |
| |
On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 16:29 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > So if I add TICK_NSEC based sleeper bonus (/2 for gentle), then starve > works -- this is the absolutely minimal amount required. It sucks a bit > it's HZ dependent, but alas. > > Also, the whole sleeper bonus gets us back into needing to track the old > vruntime and the overflow crap for super long sleeps and all that fugly > :/ I was so hoping we could delete that code. > > Oh well.
Yeah, it's a worthy target.
-Mike
| |