Messages in this thread | | | From | Kal Cutter Conley <> | Date | Wed, 8 Mar 2023 19:49:29 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] xsk: Add missing overflow check in xdp_umem_reg |
| |
> The code is fine to me. > Please resubmit with the fixed subject and expanded commit message. > I'd also prefer that you sent v3 as a separate mail, *not* as a reply to > this thread.
Done. I used "bpf" in the subject as you suggested, however I am a bit confused by this. Should changes under net/xdp generally use "bpf" in the subject?
Thanks, Kal
| |