Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:34:29 -0600 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] docs/sp_SP: Add process deprecated translation | From | Carlos Bilbao <> |
| |
On 3/6/23 09:30, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > On 2023/03/07 0:20, Carlos Bilbao wrote: >> Hello Akira, >> >> On 3/6/23 09:13, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >>> Hi Carlos, >>> >>> Minor nits in the Subject and Sob area. >>> >>> On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:44:20 -0600, Carlos Bilbao wrote: >>>> Subject: [PATCH] docs/sp_SP: Add process deprecated translation >>> >>> This summary looks ambiguous to me. >>> >>> Maybe >>> >>> docs/sp_SP: Add translation of process/deprecated >> >> This summary follows the same format followed in the past. Some examples: >> >> docs/sp_SP: Add process coding-style translation >> docs/sp_SP: Add process magic-number translation >> docs/sp_SP: Add process programming-language translation >> docs/sp_SP: Add process email-clients translation > > Let me explain why "Add process deprecated translation" looks > ambiguous. > > "deprecated translation" can be interpreted as "some translation > which is deprecated". > Of course you don't need to agree.
I see what you mean. I'm sending v2 patch renamed to avoid confusion.
> >> >>> >>> ?? >>> >>>> Translate Documentation/process/deprecated.rst into Spanish. >>>> >>>> Co-developed-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@amd.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Gonzalez <sergio.collado@gmail.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@amd.com> >>> >>> To me, Co-developed-by: from the author of the patch looks >>> strange, because it is obvious the author did some development on >>> the patch. >>> >> >> No, we both worked on this patch so Co-developed-by: is the appropriate >> tagging. That being said, Sergio translated more than I did, so I put >> him as sole Translator in the document itself. > > Hmm, anyway I don't think you are following the rule of Co-developed-by: > explained in submitting-patches.rst. > > Again, you don't need to agree... ;-)
But, why doesn't it follow the rule?
The rule is "A Co-Developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer along with the original author. This is useful at times when multiple people work on a single patch."
IMHO this is the case here, but before I send v2 I'll wait to read you again in case we agree at that point.
> > Thanks, Akira > >> >>> Which is your intent: >>> >>> Author: Carlos >>> Co-developer: Sergio >>> >>> , or >>> >>> Author: Sergio >>> Co-developer: Carlos >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> Thanks, Akira >>> >>>> --- >>>> .../translations/sp_SP/process/deprecated.rst | 381 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>> .../translations/sp_SP/process/index.rst | 1 + >>>> 2 files changed, 382 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/sp_SP/process/deprecated.rst >>> [...] >> >> Thanks, >> Carlos
Thanks, Carlos
| |