Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Mar 2023 15:24:07 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5.15] usb: dwc3: dwc3-qcom: Add missing platform_device_put() in dwc3_qcom_acpi_register_core | From | Zheng Yejian <> |
| |
On 2023/3/6 13:49, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:26:31AM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote: >> On 2023/3/3 23:49, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 10:34:39AM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote: >>>> From: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> commit fa0ef93868a6062babe1144df2807a8b1d4924d2 upstream. >>>> >>>> Add the missing platform_device_put() before return from >>>> dwc3_qcom_acpi_register_core in the error handling case. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com> >>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211231113641.31474-1-linmq006@gmail.com >>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >>>> CVE: CVE-2023-22995 >>> >>> That is a bogus CVE, please go revoke it. >> >> Agree. I see this CVE and its fixes information from NVD, >> so try to backport this patch to fix it: >> Link: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-22995 > > Again, this is not a valid bug, the "problem" described can not ever be > hit in a real system from what I can tell.
Agreed!
> >> Then should I just remove the "CVE: " field and send a v2 patch? >> Or you mean "revoke" the CVE from NVD? I actually don't know how >> to do that :( > > If you care about CVEs being "real", yes, please get it revoked from the > NVD. There is no need to backport it either from what I can determine. >
Thanks for you pationce :)
-- Zheng Yejian
> thanks, > > greg k-h
| |