lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5.15] usb: dwc3: dwc3-qcom: Add missing platform_device_put() in dwc3_qcom_acpi_register_core
From
On 2023/3/6 13:49, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:26:31AM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
>> On 2023/3/3 23:49, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 10:34:39AM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
>>>> From: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> commit fa0ef93868a6062babe1144df2807a8b1d4924d2 upstream.
>>>>
>>>> Add the missing platform_device_put() before return from
>>>> dwc3_qcom_acpi_register_core in the error handling case.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211231113641.31474-1-linmq006@gmail.com
>>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>>>> CVE: CVE-2023-22995
>>>
>>> That is a bogus CVE, please go revoke it.
>>
>> Agree. I see this CVE and its fixes information from NVD,
>> so try to backport this patch to fix it:
>> Link: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-22995
>
> Again, this is not a valid bug, the "problem" described can not ever be
> hit in a real system from what I can tell.

Agreed!

>
>> Then should I just remove the "CVE: " field and send a v2 patch?
>> Or you mean "revoke" the CVE from NVD? I actually don't know how
>> to do that :(
>
> If you care about CVEs being "real", yes, please get it revoked from the
> NVD. There is no need to backport it either from what I can determine.
>

Thanks for you pationce :)

--
Zheng Yejian

> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:44    [W:0.036 / U:1.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site