lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 5/5] mfd: max77541: Add ADI MAX77541/MAX77540 PMIC Support
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:51:18PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 17:35 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 14:46 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > IIRC, regmap_read() is not really reentrant and it is used in
> > > > > the
> > > > > IIO
> > > > > driver on the sysfs interface. So, yeah, I think you need the
> > > > > regmap
> > > > > lock and better just leave the config as is. Yes, the lock is
> > > > > opt-
> > > > > out
> > > > > so let's not disable it :)
> > > >
> > > > All the regmap operations are fully thread safe.
> > >
> > > Even if 'config->disable_locking' is set? I think that is what's
> > > being
> > > discussed in here...
> >
> > In case the driver has its own lock to serialize IO how on earth the
> > regmap
> > lock is needed. That's what I asked the author of the driver. He told
> > the code
>
> Well, if the driver has it's own locking, then sure we do not need
> regmap's lock...
>
> > doesn't require the regmap lock, and I tend to believe the author.
> > So, why to
> > keep it?
>
> However, if you look at the adc driver, I can see plain regmap_read()
> calls without any "outside" locking.

Then author of the code should know what they are doing. Right?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-28 17:49    [W:0.218 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site