| From | Shakeel Butt <> | Date | Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:20:15 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] memcg: do not modify rstat tree for zero updates |
| |
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:17 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> wrote: > > In some situations, we may end up calling memcg_rstat_updated() with a > value of 0, which means the stat was not actually updated. An example is > if we fail to reclaim any pages in shrink_folio_list(). > > Do not add the cgroup to the rstat updated tree in this case, to avoid > unnecessarily flushing it. > > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
|