lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] tools/nolibc: add support for stack protector
    On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 08:41:29PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
    > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 11:00:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
    > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 06:55:57PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
    > > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 06:05:15PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
    > > > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 06:00:45PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
    > > > > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 08:45:55AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
    > > > > > > Glad I could "help"! Timers. Huh. ;-)
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Checking v6.2, though the rebase is a bit messy, so I won't be all
    > > > > > > that confident in the results.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I got the same as you now. I don't know what I missed before not to
    > > > > > face it, maybe it's the consequence of the rebase. I've re-applied
    > > > > > the patches on top of 6.2.8 and am retesting now.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > I think you don't need to waste more of your time on this for now
    > > > > > since we have a reproducer. Thomas and I should take over.
    > > > >
    > > > > And it's a 6.3 regression, as 6.2.8 works fine:
    > > > >
    > > > > $ make run
    > > > > (...)
    > > > > Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#2)
    > > > > make[1]: Leaving directory '/g/public/linux/master'
    > > > > 126 test(s) passed.
    > > > > $ tail run.out
    > > > > Errors during this test: 0
    > > > >
    > > > > Running test 'protection'
    > > > > 0 -fstackprotector [OK]
    > > > > Errors during this test: 0
    > > > >
    > > > > Total number of errors: 0
    > > > > Leaving init with final status: 0
    > > > > [ 3.388706] ACPI: PM: Preparing to enter system sleep state S5
    > > > > [ 3.389424] reboot: Power down
    > > > >
    > > > > Now let's have fun bisecting it!
    > > >
    > > > So I have a good news, 6.3-rc1 which dev.2023.03.20a is based on, fails,
    > > > while 6.3-rc3 works. I haven't got further yet and am not sure it's useful
    > > > to dig further given that it's an already fixed problem that is not related
    > > > to the patches in your branch. I don't know if you usually rebase on more
    > > > recent tags though.
    > >
    > > Thank you for chasing this down!
    > >
    > > In this case, I will at the very least merge with v6.3 before testing.
    > > I have Joel Fernandes and Boqun Feng trying their hands at running
    > > the RCU pull request for v6.4, so I will probably resist the urge to
    > > inject confusion by rebasing onto v6.3-rc1. ;-)
    >
    > And merging the -rcu tree's "dev" branch with v6.3-rc3 got me a successful test:
    >
    > Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#5)
    > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/git/linux-build'
    > 125 test(s) passed.
    >
    > So looking good. ;-)

    Perfect then! Thank you for double-checking!
    Willy

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2023-03-27 06:05    [W:2.407 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site