Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:55:27 -0700 | From | Nicolin Chen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 12/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED type of allocations |
| |
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 02:51:45PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:50:34AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 04:44:58PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > > > > @@ -2923,8 +2949,16 @@ arm_smmu_domain_alloc_user(struct device *dev, struct iommu_domain *parent, > > > > const struct iommu_hwpt_arm_smmuv3 *user_cfg = user_data; > > > > struct arm_smmu_master *master = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); > > > > unsigned type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED; > > > > + struct arm_smmu_domain *s2 = NULL; > > > > + > > > > + if (parent) { > > > > + if (parent->ops != arm_smmu_ops.default_domain_ops) > > > > + return NULL; > > > > + type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED; > > > > + s2 = to_smmu_domain(parent); > > > > + } > > > Please can you explain the (use) case where !parent. This creates an > > > unmanaged S1? > > > > It creates an unmanaged type of a domain. The decision to mark > > it as an unmanaged S1 or an unmanaged S2 domain, is done in the > > finalise() function that it checks the S2 flag and set a stage > > accordingly. > > This also needs to be fixed up, the alloc_user should not return > incompletely initialized domains.
The finalise() is called at the end of __arm_smmu_domain_alloc() so alloc_user passing a dev pointer completes the initialization actually.
Thanks Nicolin
| |